4 Answers to the 4 Key Questions About the EU Initial List of Jurisdictions Highly Likely to Facilitate Tax Avoidance

 

151211_eu_flags

Q: Who is Excluded from the EU Blacklisting Exercise?

A: A differentiated approach was followed according to the status of the jurisdictions. First, the 28 member states and the territories considered to be European Commission – DG Taxation and Customs Union – 13/09/2016 part of a Member State such as those covered by Article 355(1) TFEU are not included in the tables drawn from the scoreboard. Second, third country jurisdictions that already have a transparency agreement with the EU feature separately in the scoreboard. Currently, this covers Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Andorra, Monaco and San Marino. And finally, the 48 least developed countries (LDC) identified by the United Nations are also featured separately, in recognition of the particular constraints they face.

Q:What criteria did the EC use to create an initial blacklist  of jurisdictions highly likely to facilitate tax avoidance?

The EC used three elements to distinguish the non-excluded jurisdictions. These distinguishing factors were:

  • Strength of economic ties with the EU using indicators s trade data, affiliates controlled by EU residents and bilateral FDI flow.
  • Level of financial activity to determine if a jurisdiction had a disproportionately high level of financial services exports, or a disconnection between their financial activity and the real economy. For this the EC relied on indicators such as total FDI, specific financial income flows and statistics on foreign affiliates were used.
  • Stability factors which assessed  whether jurisdictions would be considered by tax avoiders as a safe place to place their money; and  general governance indicators such as the level of corruption and the quality of regulation in the jurisdiction.

Based on the scores received by the assessed jurisdictions in all three areas a final ranking was agreed.

Q:  Once the level of economic relevance was determined, how did the EC determine whether a jurisdiction was highly likely to enable tax avoidance?

A: The EC used the following three factors to determine the risk profile of the assessed countries:

  • The level of compliance with international Transparency and Exchange of information standards
  •  The existence of preferential tax regimes as identified though publicly available information.
  • The absence of a corporate income tax or the presence of a zero corporate tax rate

Q: Based on this methodology which countries were listed by the EU as jurisdictions highly likely to facilitate tax avoidance?

A. 81 non-EU member states; representing almost half of the membership of the United Nations.

Here is the list:

Albania
American Samoa
Anguilla
Antigua and Barbuda
Armenia
Aruba
Australia
Bahamas
Bahrain
Barbados
Belize
Bermuda
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
British Virgin Islands
Cabo Verde
Canada
Cayman Islands
Chile4
China, Hong Kong SAR
China, Macao SAR
China, Taiwan Republic of
Colombia
Cook Islands
Costa Rica
Curaçao
Dominica
Faeroe Islands
Fiji
Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
Greenland
Grenada
Guam
Guernsey
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Isle of Man
Israel
Jamaica
Japan
Jersey
Jordan
Korea, Republic o
Malaysia
Maldives
Mauritius
Mongolia
Montenegro
Morocco
Namibia
New Caledonia
Norway
Oman
Panama
Peru
Qatar
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Samoa
Saudi Arabia
Serbia
Seychelles
Singapore
South Africa
Swaziland
Thailand
Trinidad and Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turks and Caicos Islands
United Arab Emirates
United States
Uruguay
US Virgin Islands

VietNam

 

 

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “4 Answers to the 4 Key Questions About the EU Initial List of Jurisdictions Highly Likely to Facilitate Tax Avoidance

  1. So who did not get on the list and why ?

    Peter N. Boos FCA The Bay House Cattlewash St.Joseph Barbados.

    +1-246-433-9768 +1-246-266-8585(cell)

    >

    Like

    1. EU member states ; Non EU countries who have concluded transparency agreements with the EU and least developing countries. First category pretty self explantory; second…how fortuitous to have Switzerland et all escaping assessment and as for the third group…that would be very bad PR

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s